Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Newark Smelting & Refining Co.

New York County Court, Essex County

Decided December 4, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Haktshopjste, C. P. J.

Defendant moves to strike the complaint herein on the ground that proceedings in the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau are plaintiffs’ sole and exclusive remedy.

Plaintiff Charles Wilson is a minor over "16 years of age” but "under the age of 18 yeaTS.” He sues the defendant employer in the first count for negligence in and about his employment, alleging his employment in a foundry to be in violation of law. R. S. 34:2-21.17; N. J. S. A. 34:2-21.17. The plaintiff father sues in the second count on the same facts for expenses and loss of services of his son. Since both sides…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hetzel v. Wasson Piston Ring Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  2. Buonfiglio v. R. Neumann & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  3. In re the Sale of Lands Devised to St. Michael's ChurchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  4. Damato v. DeluciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Lesko v. Liondale Bleach Dye & Print WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HOULIHAN EX REL. HOULIHAN v. RaymondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Goetaski v. California Packing Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API