Legal Opinion

Damato v. Delucia

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 27, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The petitioner, a minor under sixteen years of age, was injured while illegally employed in defendant’s bakery. He, and his parents, sued in a common law action and recovered damages. He then proceeded under his compensation petition previously filed, and received an award from the bureau. This award the Supreme Court sustained.

It was decided in Terlingo v. Belz-Parr, Inc., 106 N. J. L. 221, that the amendment to section 9 of the Workmen’s Compensation act (Pamph. L. 1924, p. 359), did not deprive the infant of his common law action, although…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chickachop v. Manpower, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. Seltzer v. IsaacsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Balogh v. LadanyeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. HOULIHAN EX REL. HOULIHAN v. RaymondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. National Grange Mutual Ins. Co. v. SchneiderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API