Lesko v. Liondale Bleach Dye & Print Works
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On defendant’s rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, Chief Justice..
The defendant company operates a large laundering plant at Rockaway, in this state. Some time in 1916, Andrew Kline, the ward of the plaintiff, was employed by the company, and in June of that year was put to work upon a washing or laundering machine. His specific work was to keep the edge of the goods which were *5run through the machine from curling or getting folded, as it passed over the rollers. His hand apparently became entangled in the machinery, was drawn in between two of.the rollers, and crushed. At the time of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lenahan v. Pittston Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. Petersen Beverage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Netherlands American Steam Nav. Co. v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Wlock v. Fort Dummer MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Widdoes v. LaubSuperior Court of Delaware · 1925
- In re StonerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.