Legal Opinion
Rudzinskas v. Retractable Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided June 12, 2025No. 4:24-cv-00009Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION MARYANN RUDZINSKAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV424-009 ) RETRACTABLE ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Currently before the Court are several motions related to the parties’ expert witnesses. First, Defendant seeks exclusion of Plaintiff’s expert John Odom, M.D. Doc. 32. Plaintiff opposes, doc. 39, and the parties dispute whether the Court should consider that untimely opposition, docs. 40, 51, & 58. Meanwhile, Plaintiff seeks exclusion of Defendant’s experts John Borsa, doc. 34, and Jordan Duesman, doc. 35,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Quiet Technology DC-8, Inc., Quiet Technology, Inc. v. Hurel-Dubois UK LTD.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.