Carlino v. Gloucester City High School

OPINION

ORLOFSKY, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION. OS '

II.FACTUAL BACKGROUND. T — t y-i

III. LEGAL STANDARD GOVERNING THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. T — J

IV. DISCUSSION. t-J — )

A. Count One: Student Plaintiffs’ Equal Protection Claim. í — i

B. Counts Two and Eleven: Student Plaintiffs’Free Exercise and Separation of Church and State Claims . 03

1. Lee v. Weisman.

2. The Lemon Test.

a. Secular Purpose 25

b. Endorsement. 25

c. Excessive Entanglement. 26

3. Qualified Immunity. 26

C. Count Three: Student Plaintiffs’ Due Process Claim. 26

D. Count Four: Todd…