Legal Opinion
Hutchinson v. Delaware Savings Bank FSB
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 25, 2006No. Civil Action 04-4809 (JEI)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs James and Sharon Hutchinson, husband and wife, bring the present suit against the Defendants, a lender and two loan servicing companies, asserting claims under federal and New Jersey law arising out of the refinancing of the Hutchinson’s home mortgage. The Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 1
I
In 1998, Plaintiffs lived at 6987 Harding Highway, Mays Landing, New Jersey. The property was subject to a primary mortgage under which Plaintiffs owed $74,500 to Norwest Mortgage at an interest…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nami v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Buckley v. Trenton Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Jenkins v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Lane v. Vitek Real Estate Industries GroupDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Padilla v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Block v. Seneca Mortgage ServicingDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.