United States v. Richard Heuer, United States of America v. Eugene Holderness
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Eugene Holderness and Richard Heuer worked for Hi-Shear Technology Corporation. These consolidated appeals involve the storage, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste after Hi-Shear closed a facility which produced propellants in Saugus, California, and opened a new facility in Storey County, Nevada. Holderness and Heuer were convicted in connection with these activities of violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq., and of making false statements under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Leo BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. YermianSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Sandra Vaccaro, John Vaccaro, Michael Brennan, Paul Bond, Norman Alvis, Stephen Labarbera, Dorothy Snider, and William CushingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Andre Lavon TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jerry Wayne MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Krikor Baghdassar Tatoyan, A/K/A Krikor Tatoyan, United States of America v. Zenda Bedros Tatoyan, A/K/A Zenda TatoyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Interstate Non-Ferrous Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2003
- United States v. Jg-24, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.