Legal Opinion

United States v. Yermian

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-346PublishedCited by 204 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

It is a federal crime under 18 U. S. C. § 1001 to make any false or fraudulent statement in any matter within the jurisdiction of a federal agency.1 To establish a violation of §1001, the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the statement was made with knowledge of its falsity. This case presents the question whether the Gov*65ernment also must prove that the false statement was made with actual knowledge of federal agency jurisdiction.

HH

Respondent E small Yermian was convicted m the District Court of Central California on three counts of making false statements in a matter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. Joseph Lichenstein and Leo BellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Bobbie Stanford, Louis Watson, Janice Davis, Estella Patterson, Doris Beverly, Dorothy Fife, Richard O'rourke, and Dorothy JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. LonardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Hubbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Luna Torres v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API