Rayhol Co. v. Holland
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
It should be noted that at all times the defendants have held the property subject to the terms of a declaration of trust, for at the time they acquired it they executed a written memorandum in which they agreed, by way of testamentary provision, to secure the property, or the proceeds of it if sold, subject to life uses to themselves, to their daughter, or if she died, to secure to Mrs. Jenner the share of the life use to which Mrs. Holland was entitled. Such a declaration would be sufficient to give rise to a trust in which Mrs. Jenner or her estate would be a beneficiary; 1 Perry on Trusts…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Johnson v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Hull v. ThomsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Frink v. BranchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gulack v. GulackConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Hills v. Travelers Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Roberts v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Geib v. McKinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Griffin v. SturgesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.