Legal Opinion

Hills v. Travelers Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1939PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

This action was brought by the named plaintiff and Thomas K. Hills, sons of Charles I. Hills, now deceased, against the named defendant as trustee of the trust mentioned in the complaint, Matilda King Hills Hendrickson, the widow of the decedent, hereinafter referred to as Mrs. Hills, and the attorney general of the state. The complaint alleged that on April 8, 1915, Charles I. Hills, then of Elizabeth, New Jersey, but since deceased, quitclaimed to Arthur L. Shipman certain real estate located in Hartford, with instructions in accordance with which Shipman, by his deed dated April 20, 1915,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Claflin v. ClaflinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Sears v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Bartlett v. SearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  4. Ansonia National Bank v. KunkelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Olsen v. YoungermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Peiter v. DegenringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  4. Penick v. Bank of WadesboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Altemeier v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API