Legal Opinion
Tharalson v. Hennepin Parks
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 23, 1996No. Nos. C3-96-203, C5-96-204 and C7-96-205Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHULTZ, Judge.*
Relators Stephen C. Sipper, Dale 0. Thar-alson, and Henry R. Krueger challenge the determination of the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs (the Commissioner) that relators’ Veterans Preference Act (VPA) claims are barred by the six-year statute of limitations for statute-based causes of action. We affirm.
FACTS
Sipper
Stephen C. Sipper alleges he is a qualified veteran who worked for the City of Edina as a firefighter in 1986. He alleges that while working for Edina, he suffered a heart attack and, after recovery, was placed in a lower paying position as a maintenance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Young v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Johnson v. County of AnokaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995