Legal Opinion

Pike v. Empire Insurance Group

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 28, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P.J.

This is a G.L.c. 90, §34M action against defendant Empire Insurance Group to recover Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits for plaintiff George Pike’s (Tike”) medical expenses and lost wages. Medical benefits were paid. As to lost wages, Pike is a self-employed operator of a limousine service. While PIP benefits are available for lost earnings from self-employment the parties could not agree on the amount of any lost earnings.

Empire filed a Mass. R. Civ. E, Rule 34, request for production of documents, which included a demand for three years of Pike’s Schedule C forms from his United…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Cronin v. StrayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Beit v. PROBATE & FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENTMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Town Taxi Inc. v. Police Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. BurgessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGovern Physical Therapy Associates v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API