Legal Opinion
Dingle v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 12, 2008No. Civil Action 06-0331(RCL), 06-0950(RCL)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Now before the court comes defendants District of Columbia, Sean Moore, Maurice Scott, Stuart Emerman, Nancy Oliver, and David Anderson’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [44], Upon consideration of the motion, plaintiffs opposition [48], the entire record herein, and the applicable law, the Court will GRANT defendants’ motion as to battery claims stemming from the May 23, 2005 incident, constitutional false arrest claims against the District of Columbia, and punitive damages claims against the District of Columbia and Officers Scott and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Sherrod v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- OLANIYI v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Harvey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Moore v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Kowalevicz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.