Legal Opinion

City of Cloquet v. Northwestern State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 1927No. 26,193PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Demurrers to the complaint were overruled; in so doing the court certified the questions presented to be important and doubtful. Defendants appeal.

The substance of the complaint may be stated thus: Prior to 1925, the defendant bank had been and during that year was a duly designated depository for the funds of plaintiff; that in July, 1925, the bank deposited $35,000 in liberty bonds with the city treasurer in lieu of surety bonds, pursuant to the provisions of L. 1925, p. 168, c. 173; that on September 13, 1926, the defendant commissioner of banks took possession of the property and business…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yellowstone County v. First Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Brown v. Sheldon State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Hunt v. HopleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Fidelity State Bank v. North Fork Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Phillips v. Yates Center National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Rien, Trustee, Etc. v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Campion v. Village of GracevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. City of Ortonville v. HahnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. County of Traverse v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API