City of Ortonville v. Hahn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff seeks to recover upon the $10,000 official bond of defendant Hahn, its treasurer. The other defendants are his sureties. The Ortonville State Bank was duly designated as plaintiff’s de pository. It furnished a statutory bond in the sum of $10,000. The treasurer thereafter deposited money in the bank to the extent of $12,715.89, and while said sum was therein it failed and went into the hands of the commissioner of banks. Upon receiving a 15 per cent dividend from the commissioner, plaintiff applied $1,500 upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Journal Publishing Co. v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Cole v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- City of Cloquet v. Northwestern State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- London & Northwest American Mortgage Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Minshull v. American Surety Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Casualty Co. v. SazenskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- School District No. 75 v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Village of MaywoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Anderson v. Peterson State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Benson v. American Surety Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937