County of Traverse v. Veigel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant in charge of the Farmers State Bank of Tintah for liquidation appeals from a judgment determining that a certain amount of plaintiff’s funds in the bank were trust funds entitled to preference.,
The bank while a going concern was a duly designated county depository, having given a bond for $6,000, which authorized the county treasurer, under G-. S. 1923, § 848, to deposit county funds therein up to $3,000. On November 9, 1926, there was to the credit of plaintiff in its deposit account a sum less than $3,000. But it appears that previous thereto the bank had received $4,752.60 more…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yellowstone County v. First Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Brown v. Sheldon State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Page County v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Fidelity State Bank v. North Fork Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Powell v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bauck v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- County of Traverse v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Anderson v. Peterson State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934