Bartles-Scott Oil Co. v. Western Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This appeal from a judgment following an order overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, presents the single question as to whether lubricating oil used by a steam engine in the gravel pit, and gasolene and lubricating oils used by motor trucks in transporting the gravel to its place in embankment are “materials under or for the purpose of the contract” within the meaning of a public contractor’s bond using that language and given to secure the performance of a contract for the construction of a public highway.
In these days when public works could not go on as they do without the aid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fay v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Steffes v. LemkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Hansen v. RemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Lanier v. IrvineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- State v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Clifton v. NordenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- J.F. Tolton Inv. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
- Overman & Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Penn Lubric Oil Co. v. LyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.