Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Remer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1924No. Nos. 24,244-24,248, 24,254PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This action was brought on a public contractor’s bond given by Emil F. Remer, who had a contract with the state for the construction of a highway between Bena and Ball Club in Cass county. Persons having claims against him and his subcontractors intervened. The liability of the surety on the bond for the payment of these claims was in issue in the court below and in this appeal, which is taken by the surety from the judgment against it.
SURETY COMPANY’S APPEAL.
In addition to the conditions mentioned in G-. S. 1913, § 8245, the bond was conditioned for the payment by the principal of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Dawson v. Northwestern Contruction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Carter County v. Oliver-Hill Const. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Mayes v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Southern Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Clifton v. NordenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- O'BRIEN v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.