Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Schumacher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1987No. 36455; CA A36958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*546BUTTLER, P. J.

In this action for specific performance of a land sale contract, plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered at the close of his case on defendants’ motion. ORCP 54B(2). Because the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in concluding that a check mailed by defendants to plaintiff on the last day of the grace period, but received after the grace period had expired, constituted timely payment, we reverse and remand.

We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion to dismiss. See Brown v. J.C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705, 688 P2d 811 (1984). In 1979,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Gray v. PeltonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Sterrett v. Stoddard Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hays v. HugOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alderman v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Harris v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Malan v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Gordon v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Spiess v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API