Legal Opinion

Bye v. Robinette

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2015No. 20150109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Amanda Robinette appeals from a district court judge’s order adopting a referee’s order awarding primary residential responsibility of her and Erek Bye’s children to Bye and ordering her to pay child support. We affirm the portion of the district court judge’s order adopting the referee’s primary residential responsibility determination. We reverse the portion of the district court judge’s order concerning child support, and we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it calculate child support in a manner consistent with the child support guidelines.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Keita v. KeitaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Duller v. MacGillivrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In the Interest of DLMNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carroll v. CarrollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Brew v. BrewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Edison v. EdisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Rathbun v. RathbunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Martiré v. MartiréNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API