Legal Opinion

Martiré v. Martiré

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2016No. 20150139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶1] Sandra Hendricksen Martiré appeals from an amended divorce judgment modifying Michael Martiré’s child support obligation and leaving unaltered his spousal support obligation. We conclude the district court did not err in refusing to modify Martiré’s spousal support obligation. We further conclude the court failed to follow the Child Support Guidelines in setting Martiré’s child support obligation. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] This is a continuation of “contentious” divorce proceedings between parties who “accumulated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Schieffer v. SchiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Verhey v. McKenzieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kingstone v. Tedrow KingstoneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Martire' v. Martire'North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API