Legal Opinion
Reigelsperger v. Siller
California Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 2007No. S131664PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
We here consider whether an arbitration agreement, signed when a chiropractor first treated a patient, applies to a medical malpractice claim arising from treatment for a different condition two years later. We conclude that it does because the agreement states it “is intended to bind the patient and health care provider . . . who now or in the future treat[s] the patient. . . .” (Italics added.)
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In August of 2000, plaintiff Terry Reigelsperger sought treatment from chiropractor James M. Siller for severe pain in his lower back.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Theatrical Stage Employees Union, Local 16California Supreme Court · 1968
- Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. ReiswigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Coon v. NicolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Ruiz v. PodolskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Casa Del Caffe Vergnano S.P.A. v. Italflavors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Daniels v. Sunrise Senior Living, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.