Legal Opinion

Pruett v. City of Rosedale

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1982No. 53222PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

421 So.2d 1046 (1982)

Keith PRUETT

v.

CITY OF ROSEDALE, Mississippi.

No. 53222.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

November 10, 1982.

W. Allen Pepper, Jr., Cleveland, for appellant.

Walls, Buck & Irving, Tyree Irving, Greenville, for appellee.

En Banc.

BOWLING, Justice, for the Court:

This cause involves the abolition of the judicially created principle of sovereign immunity. The appeal is from the Circuit Court of Bolivar County. Appellant Keith Pruett filed his tort action against the City of Rosedale contending he was injured through the negligence of the city. Appellee, the city, filed a demurrer which…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Jones v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  5. Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Wichita Falls State Hospital v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Groseclose v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hall v. HilbunMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. City of Jackson v. LocklarMississippi Supreme Court · 1983

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API