Legal Opinion

Britton v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The facts as found by the examiner for the Industrial Commission are as follows: The Fort Atkinson Canning Company, hereinafter called “Canning Company,” is engaged in the business of canning vegetables, particularly peas; that the Canning Company entered into written contracts with the farmers in the vicinity of their plant whereby the farmers agreed to raise peas and sell same to the Canning Company at an agreed price; that the Canning Company agreed to inspect the crops and determine when it was ready for harvest and would, when it appeared necessary, arrange for the farmers to have the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Madison Entertainment Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. City of Hudson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Deep Rock Oil Co. of Wisconsin v. DerouinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Wells Coal & Dock Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Huffstettler v. Lion Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  3. Dubois v. MillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Dockery v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API