Dockery v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Motor W. Millwee, Associate Justice.
The question is whether appellee, William Earl Thomas, was engaged in an “employment” in “agricultural farm labor” at the time of his injury and, therefore, excluded from the benefits of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Sec. 2 C (1) of the Act (Ark. Stats., Sec. 81-1302 C (1)) provides in part: “Employment means: Every employment carried on in the State in which five (5) or more employees are regularly employed by the same employer in the course of business or businesses, except domestic service, agricultural farm labor , . . ”
The facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- In re BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Mundell v. SwedlundIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Roush v. HeffelbowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Oliver v. ErnstNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Franklin v. McCoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Dockery v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Drew Bailey v. RNJ Farms, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
- Griffith v. International Cattle Embryo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988