Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Unnamed Attorney
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 1, 1983No. 51, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
It is this 7th day of November, 1983
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that for reasons to be set forth in an opinion later to be filed, the decree of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City dated April 5, 1983, enjoining the Attorney Grievance Commission from proceeding with attorney disciplinary actions against the respondent unnamed attorney until final termination of a pending criminal appeal filed by respondent be, and it is hereby, vacated.
Costs to be paid by the respondent unnamed attorney. Mandate to issue forthwith.
Argued before…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Snow v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- In re Melissa M.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Attorney v. Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022