Legal Opinion

Snow v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 4, 1990No. 1713, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSALYN B. BELL, Judge.

The Fourth Amendment states that the

“right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.” 1

Distinguishing a “stop” from an “arrest” and a “frisk” from a “search,” the Supreme Court of the United States created the “reasonable suspicion” standard in order to deal “with the rapidly unfolding and often…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Cartnail v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wilkes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Wilkes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API