Scammon v. Denio
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new triaL The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This action was brought by appellant (plaintiff in the court below) to recover $1,348.10, the alleged balance due upon a written contract by which appellant was to build a house for respondent; and to enforce a mechanic’s lien against the house, and premises on which it was erected. The court gave judgment to appellant for $483.72 only, and without costs or attorney’s fee; and also gave judgment for respondent for all costs which accrued after the date of a certain offer to compromise hereinafter mentioned.
The judgment provides for the enforcement of the lien for the amount above stated.
Appell…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pomeroy v. Hulin & BeebeNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Walker v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by12 opinions
- T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Wortman v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1892
- Ball v. DoudOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Tally v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Davisson v. East Whittier Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.