Legal Opinion

Scammon v. Denio

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1887No. 11909PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new triaL The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This action was brought by appellant (plaintiff in the court below) to recover $1,348.10, the alleged balance due upon a written contract by which appellant was to build a house for respondent; and to enforce a mechanic’s lien against the house, and premises on which it was erected. The court gave judgment to appellant for $483.72 only, and without costs or attorney’s fee; and also gave judgment for respondent for all costs which accrued after the date of a certain offer to compromise hereinafter mentioned.

The judgment provides for the enforcement of the lien for the amount above stated.

Appell…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pomeroy v. Hulin & BeebeNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Walker v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wortman v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Ball v. DoudOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Tally v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Davisson v. East Whittier Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API