Davisson v. East Whittier Land & Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action to recover the sum of $1,272.91 with interest upon the first count, for labor done and materials furnished by plaintiff’s assignor in constructing and laying pipe-lines and building concrete boxes for the defendant corporation in the county of Los Angeles, for use in connection with its irrigating works; and upon the second count, to recover the further sum of $9,467.47, with interest, alleged to be due for similar work and materials furnished by plaintiff, principally in the construction of certain lateral pipe-lines in said county of Los Angeles and the county of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Loup v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Ex parte AmbroseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Roche v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Tally v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zak v. State Farm Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- W. H. Blodgett Co. v. Bebe Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Wilson v. MatteiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- First Congregational Church of Christ v. LowreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Minton v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.