Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. West Virginia Board of Law Examiners

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1990No. 19651PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice:

In this original proceeding in mandamus, the relator, Bernice B. Weinstein, seeks to compel the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners (Board) to admit her to practice in this state pursuant to our reciprocity rule, Rule 4.0(b) of the West Virginia Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law. This *159rule allows an attorney to be admitted to practice in West Virginia without taking our written bar examination if the applicant has been “lawfully engaged in the active practice of law [in any other state] for five (5) years next preceding his or her application.”1 We conclude that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kucera v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hechler v. CaseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Daurelle v. Traders Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. In Re GreenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Cowie v. RobertsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re ConnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. Parks v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API