Legal Opinion

Parks v. Board of Bar Examiners

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 22, 2005No. 04-399PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Petitioner appeals from a Board of Bar Examiners’s decision that he does not qualify for admission to practice law in Vermont without examination. We affirm.

¶ 2. The principal question bn appeal is whether “at the time of application [petitioner was] actively engaged in the practice of law for five of the preceding ten years in one or more jurisdictions of the United States,” as required for admission without examination by the Rules of Admission to the Bar of the Vermont Supreme Court (Rules) § 7(a).1 The re*600cord discloses that petitioner graduated from law school and was admitted to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alva Owen Hawkins v. Honorable Joseph R. Moss, Chief JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  2. J. Kenneth Lowrie v. Joseph H. GoldenhershCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Bassler v. BasslerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Schumacher v. NixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Petition of NennoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re ConnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. In Re Samantha GrangerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API