In re Conner
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Cheryl L. Conner appeals from a decision of the Vermont Board of Bar Examiners denying her application for admission to the bar on motion. Conner contends the Board erred in declining to credit her law-school teaching experience toward the “active-practice” requirement, arguing that: (1) her experience as director of a clinical internship program qualifies her for admission; (2) Vermont’s reciprocity rule compels her admission under the standards of her home state of Massachusetts; and (3) the Vermont Rules of Admission violate her federal constitutional rights. We affirm.
¶2. The record…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spencer v. Utah State BarUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Lewis Y. BirtSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In re Jeffrey G. OdenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In re Robert GrundsteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In re Application of McDonnellNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.