Legal Opinion

In re Conner

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 27, 2006No. 05-495PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Cheryl L. Conner appeals from a decision of the Vermont Board of Bar Examiners denying her application for admission to the bar on motion. Conner contends the Board erred in declining to credit her law-school teaching experience toward the “active-practice” requirement, arguing that: (1) her experience as director of a clinical internship program qualifies her for admission; (2) Vermont’s reciprocity rule compels her admission under the standards of her home state of Massachusetts; and (3) the Vermont Rules of Admission violate her federal constitutional rights. We affirm.

¶2. The record…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Utah State BarUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re Lewis Y. BirtSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  3. In re Jeffrey G. OdenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. In re Robert GrundsteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  5. In re Application of McDonnellNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API