Legal Opinion

Camaione v. Borough of Latrobe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1989No. 96 Western District Appeal Docket 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

523 Pa. 363 (1989)

567 A.2d 638

Joseph CAMAIONE, Sr., Appellee,

v.

BOROUGH OF LATROBE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 28, 1989.

Decided December 21, 1989.

Reargument Denied February 20, 1990.

James E. Kelley, Jr., McDonald, Moore, Mason & Snyder, Latrobe, for appellant.

Vincent J. Quatrini, Jr., Greensburg, for appellee.

Anthony C. Busillo, II, Harrisburg, for amicus curiae, PA Lodge of the FOP.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

This is the appeal of the Borough of Latrobe (Borough) from the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Callahan v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Kusza v. MaximonisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Kusza v. MAXIMONISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Cunningham v. COM., PENN. ST. POLICESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API