Legal Opinion
Floren v. Whittington
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided October 2, 2003No. CIV.A. 2:02-1083PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL
HADEN, District Judge.
Pending are Plaintiffs Exceptions and Objections to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Stanley’s Order Denying the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel.
By Order entered September 5, 2003, the Magistrate Judge summarized a telephone conference with counsel held September 4. Floren v. Whittington, C.A. No. 2:02-1083, slip op. at 1-2 (S.D.W.Va. Sept.5, 2003)(Order). The Magistrate Judge’s Order states, “The parties advised the court that they had resolved all disputes except for those relating to Plaintiffs request to review the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Spell v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- King v. CondeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Burke v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wolfe v. GreenDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
- (PC) Stone v. PfiefferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Washington v. HicksDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021