Legal Opinion
(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 29, 2024No. 1:21-cv-01461Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-NODJ-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL 13 v. (ECF Nos. 90, 98, 99) 14 C. PFEIFFER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s three separate motions to compel, filed on June 20 2, 2023 and June 15, 2023, respectively. (ECF Nos. 90, 98, 99.) 21 I. 22 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 23 This action is proceeding…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.