Legal Opinion

(PC) Washington v. Hicks

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 16, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00156Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-NONE-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL IN PART 13 vs. (ECF No. 41.) 14 HICKS, et al., FORTY-FIVE-DAY DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT ROCHA TO PRODUCE 15 Defendants DOCUMENTS REQUESTED BY PLAINTIFF IN HIS REQUEST FOR 16 PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENT, SET ONE, NO. 2, PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER 17 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this 20 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API