Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. GM Assembly Division, General Motors Corp.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 2, 1972No. 607, September Term, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

On 3 April 1972 by an unreported per curiam opinion we remanded this case without affirming, reversing, or modifying the judgment, Maryland Rule 1071, for compliance with Rules 18 § c and 564 § b 2 requiring that within fifteen days after entry of an appealable final judgment in a contested action at law tried upon the merits without a jury, the lower court shall make a memorandum of the grounds for decision by dictating to the court stenographer or reporter, or by preparing and filing in the action, a brief statement of the grounds for its decision and the basis for determining damages, if…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Foble v. KnefelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Jackson v. FerreeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Rieger v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rhoads v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  2. Quinlan & Tyson, Inc. v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Dent v. CahillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Lettering Unlimited v. GuyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Sargent v. BOARD OF EDUC., BALTO. CTY.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API