Legal Opinion
Lettering Unlimited v. Guy
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 11, 1990No. 34, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation case the issue is whether the claimant’s bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome is an occupational disease or an accidental injury. Resolution of the issue controls which of two compensation insurers is on the risk.
The claimant, Janet Guy (Guy), was employed by Lettering Unlimited. She was awarded temporary total disability for the period October 31, 1987, to January 14, 1988, by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission (the Commission). The Commission found that Guy sustained an occupational disease, that the date of last injurious exposure was October…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daniel L. SHULL, Appellant, v. DAIN, KALMAN & QUAIL, INC., a Corporation, and Harry Ware, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Pahanish v. Western Trails, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Foble v. KnefelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Miller v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Homa v. Friendly Mobile Manor, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Berry v. Boeing Military AirplanesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
- Noble v. Lamoni ProductsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Bricker v. WarchCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.