Legal Opinion
Sargent v. BOARD OF EDUC., BALTO. CTY.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 3, 1981No. 1605, September Term, 1980PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.
The Workmen’s Compensation Commission determined that appellant, a custodial employee of the Baltimore County Board of Education, was entitled to compensation by reason of an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of her employment. The Circuit Court for Baltimore County, on appeal by the Board, reversed that determination. We think that the commission was correct and that the court was wrong.
In 1972, appellant became employed by the Board as a Custodian II. That was a classification reserved exclusively for females, whose duties were limited to "light work” such as sweeping…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schemmel v. T. B. Gatch & Sons Contracting & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- J. Norman Geipe, Inc. v. CollettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Stancliff v. H. B. Davis Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State Roads Commission v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dunlavey v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Belcher v. T. Rowe Price Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- American Airlines Corp. v. StokesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Pro-Football, Inc. v. TupaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.