Legal Opinion

Zielke v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 29, 1997No. 2950534PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

David D. Zielke purchased a used Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais automobile from an automobile dealership in 1989, entering into an installment sales contract with the dealership. Among other things, the contract required Zielke to make 42 monthly payments and to maintain insurance coverage on the automobile. AmSouth Bank, N.A.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Big B, Inc. v. CottinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Eidson v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. May v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Pinyan v. Community BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Vance v. HuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. ICN Medical Alliance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Southland Bank v. a & a Drywall Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Irvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Doster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. Buckentin v. Suntrust Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API