Bevans v. Iron Workers' Tri-State Welfare Plan
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, Chief Judge.
This matter is now before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [#12] is DENIED, and Defendant’s 1 Motion for Summary Judgment [#15] is GRANTED.
Factual Background
Defendant, Iron Workers’ Tri-State Welfare Plan (the “Plan”), is a self-funded employee welfare benefit plan as defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). (Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts (“Defendant’s Statement”) at 1.) As such, the purpose of the Plan is to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cranfill v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Critchlow v. First Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Eckelberry v. ReliaStar Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005
- Gerdes v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2001
- Guin v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2002