Legal Opinion

Bevans v. Iron Workers' Tri-State Welfare Plan

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided January 27, 1997No. 96-4035PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MIHM, Chief Judge.

This matter is now before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [#12] is DENIED, and Defendant’s 1 Motion for Summary Judgment [#15] is GRANTED.

Factual Background

Defendant, Iron Workers’ Tri-State Welfare Plan (the “Plan”), is a self-funded employee welfare benefit plan as defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). (Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts (“Defendant’s Statement”) at 1.) As such, the purpose of the Plan is to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cranfill v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Critchlow v. First Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
  3. Eckelberry v. ReliaStar Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005
  4. Gerdes v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2001
  5. Guin v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API