Legal Opinion

Estate of Coleman

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1922No. S. F. No. 10177PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, J., pro tem.

Three separate appeals are here involved, each being from a separate order of the trial court in probate. Ttvo of the orders appealed from are brief, informal minute entries, the substance of which is embodied in the third, a formal order of court signed by the judge and entered at length in the minutes. It is apparent that the determination of the appeal from the complete formal order will be determinative of the three appeals, and the parties have so stipulated. The single question here involved concerns the correct construction to be placed upon certain terms of the will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Estate of PeabodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of BrunetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Freyermuth v. SpeckterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re Estate of ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Loescher v. LoescherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Chandler v. St. Mary's College of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API