Legal Opinion

Chandler v. St. Mary's College of Oakland

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14267PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

After further consideration of this cause, we are satisfied to readopt the opinion of Mr. Justice Preston, formerly rendered herein, which is as follows, to wit:

“Appeal from order admitting to probate a purported will of decedent dated March 27, 1929, and denying admis sion to probate of a purported will dated December 13, 1928. The question is whether the testatrix intended the later instrument to be a codicil to the earlier one or whether she intended it to stand alone as her last will and testament.
“The testatrix, Hermina .Peralta Dargie, a resident of Alameda county, passed away…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Davidson v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Estate of ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Ramelow v. SmilieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Estate of DargieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Martin v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API