Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 25, 2003No. 27922-3-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

63 P.3d 866 (2003)

Stephen KENNEDY, a married man, as his separate property, Plaintiff,

v.

Tom MARTIN, Jr. and Sharon Martin, husband and wife, Appellants,

First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Port Angeles, Defendant,

Joseph G. Cammack and Kaylee F. Cammack, Husband And Wife, Respondents.

No. 27922-3-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

February 25, 2003.

As Amended March 25, 2003.

William J. Mc Dowell, Wenatchee, WA, for Respondent.

William Boyd Foster, Lynnwood, WA, for Appellant.

QUINN-BRINTNALL, A.C.J.

Stephen Kennedy sought an easement of necessity across Tom and Sharon Martin's…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Panorama Village Condominium Owners Ass'n Board of Directors v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Panorama Village v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hellberg v. Coffin Sheep Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Beckman v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Stephens v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Noble v. SAFE HARBOR PRESERVATION TRUSTWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cirelli v. EntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Noble v. SAFE HARBOR FAMILY PRESERVATION TRUSTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Ruvalcaba v. Kwang Ho BaekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API