Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 25, 2003No. 27922-3-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J. —

Stephen Kennedy sought an easement of necessity across Tom and Sharon Martin’s property. The Martins joined Joseph and Kaylee Cammack, adjacent landowners, claiming that the easement should be placed across their property. The trial court granted Kennedy an easement over the Martins’ property and *868ordered the Martins to pay the Cammacks’ attorney fees. The Martins appeal only the attorney fee award. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1969, Kennedy’s parents divided property in Clallam County into two separate parcels. That same year, they sold the western parcel to the Martins, leaving…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Panorama Village Condominium Owners Ass'n Board of Directors v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Panorama Village v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hellberg v. Coffin Sheep Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Beckman v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Noble v. SAFE HARBOR PRESERVATION TRUSTWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation TrustWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cirelli v. EntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Kennedy v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Noble v. SAFE HARBOR FAMILY PRESERVATION TRUSTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API