Legal Opinion
Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Rose Electronics, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 24, 2007No. CV06-1711MJPPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART AVOCENT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
PECHMAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties cross-motions regarding entry of a protective order. This is a patent case involving Keyboard-Video-Mouse (KVM) switch technology. The parties have reached agreement on the majority of a protective order, but disagree regarding three provisions in the order. Plaintiff Avocent Redmond Corp. has moved for entry of its version of the protective order. (Dkt. No. 57.) Defendants oppose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Amgen, Inc. v. Elanex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Island Intellectual Property LLC v. Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2008
- Greenstreak Group, Inc. v. P.N.A. Construction Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.