Legal Opinion

Greenstreak Group, Inc. v. P.N.A. Construction Technologies, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided June 19, 2008No. 4:07CV2099-DJSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DONALD J. STOHR, District Judge.

The parties disagree as to one provision of a proposed protective order governing the parties’ handling of confidential information disclosed in the course of this action. The dispute is now before the Court in the form of cross-motions advocating the parties’ positions as to the inclusion or omission of the disputed provision.

Plaintiff Greenstreak seeks language restricting attorneys to whom a defined catego*391ry of “Restricted Confidential” information is disclosed from participating in the prosecution of any patent “relating to the same general subject…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Rose Electronics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gen-Probe Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
  2. Methode Electronics, Inc. v. DPH-DAS LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API