Greenstreak Group, Inc. v. P.N.A. Construction Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DONALD J. STOHR, District Judge.
The parties disagree as to one provision of a proposed protective order governing the parties’ handling of confidential information disclosed in the course of this action. The dispute is now before the Court in the form of cross-motions advocating the parties’ positions as to the inclusion or omission of the disputed provision.
Plaintiff Greenstreak seeks language restricting attorneys to whom a defined catego*391ry of “Restricted Confidential” information is disclosed from participating in the prosecution of any patent “relating to the same general subject…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Rose Electronics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gen-Probe Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Methode Electronics, Inc. v. DPH-DAS LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010