Robinson v. City of Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McClendon, justice.
Nathan Robinson sued the City of Dallas to enjoin it from canceling a liquor package store permit the city had issued to him, and for a judgment declaratory of his rights under the City’s Ordinance No. 3373, prohibiting permits to establishments within 300 feet of a church, and prescribing the method for measuring the 300 feet. The trial was to the court upon an agreed statement of facts, and the judgment was in favor of the city. Robinson has appealed.
Robinson’s brief states that the sole issue for determination is the correct method of measurement under the ordinance, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Amarillo v. StapfTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Hallum v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Stubbs v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- T & R Associates., Inc. v. City of Amarillo, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985
- W. H. Barber Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Rickels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Ezzell v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.