Rickels v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VALDEZ, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Terry Rickels, appeals the revocation of his probation. 1 He argues through three points of error that the trial court abused its discretion when it revoked his probation because: (1) the evidence was insufficient to establish that the appellant violated his probation; (2) the condition was too vagué and indefinite to be enforced; and (3) the condition was an unlawful delegation of authority to the probation department. 2 We reverse the judgment revoking appellant’s probation and remand the case to the trial court.
Facts
Appellant was convicted of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Scamardo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Todd v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rickels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Rickels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- John Douglas Houston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
- Martin Ochoa, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Rickels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.