Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shorall
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 7, 1991No. 541 Disciplinary Docket 2PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
This Court, in response to the Report and Recommendation filed in this matter on July 12, 1988, by the Disciplinary Board issued a Rule to Show Cause Why Respondent, Thomas J. Shorall, should not be disbarred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Having considered the pleadings and briefs filed by Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), having heard oral argument, and having fully reviewed the record submitted by the Board, we order that the Rule to Show Cause be discharged and that Respondent be suspended from the practice of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ZdrokSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WingerterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. CraigWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.